DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Cannon, 427 So. 2d 827.

86 citing documents.

  • State v. Lott 574 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Stanford 574 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Frith 561 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    State v. Prudholm, supra.
  • State v. Burrell 561 So. 2d 692 La. 1990
    -33 (La.1982) (on rehearing).
  • State v. Holland 544 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Ward 542 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    See; (on rehearing); State v. Talbot, supra.
  • State v. Fayard 537 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Dickerson 529 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Brown 522 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    The Louisiana Supreme court specifically addressed the issue of recanted testimony with respect to the ruling on a motion for a -33 (La.1982).
  • State v. Schrader 506 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Coates 509 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    (on rehearing); State v. Brown .
  • State v. Spears 504 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Waymire 504 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Toussaint 502 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    The trial judge's application of these precepts to newly discovered evidence is entitled to great weight, and his denial of a new trial motion will not be disturbed on appeal absent a (on rehearing); (on rehearing)....
  • State v. Guidroz 498 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Hawkins 496 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    art. 841; , on rehearing (La.1982).
  • State v. Bahm 490 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Feet 481 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Brown 481 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Ruffin 475 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Reynolds 473 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Necaise 466 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Granger 463 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Floyd 458 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Hall 454 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    The trial judge's application of these precepts to newly discovered evidence is entitled to great weight, and his denial of a new trial motion will not be disturbed on appeal absent a (on rehearing); (on rehearing).
  • State v. Beckendorf 451 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. DeHart 445 So. 2d 419 La. 1984
  • State v. Humphrey 445 So. 2d 1155 La. 1984
    Bryan, supra; (On Rehearing).
  • State v. Prudholm 446 So. 2d 729 La. 1984
  • State v. Pendergist 444 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Paul 439 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    The law applicable to the granting of a new trial, based on newly discovered evidence, as follows: The burden is on the defendant to show that the new evidence was not discoverable prior to or during trial and that if the evidence had been introduced at trial, the new evidence probably would have caused the trier of fact to reach a different verdict.
  • State v. Thom 438 So. 2d 208 La. 1983
  • State v. Burdgess 434 So. 2d 1062 La. 1983
  • State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King 436 So. 2d 559 La. 1983
  • State v. Davis 431 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    In a recent decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court, also a “recantation” case, that court found the recanting witness’ testimony to be “simply unbelievable” because it was “directly contradictory to testimony which she had given twice before and which had been corroborated by another eyewitness.” In this case, as in D’Ingianni, supra, “all of the evidence ta