State v. Hudson
State v. Hudson, 431 So. 2d 1050 (La. 1982).
Cited by
- State v. Hotard 885 So. 2d 533 La. 2004
- State v. Mims 552 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. McDonald 471 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Swaggerty 418 So. 2d 1351
Opinion text
Transferred. In this writ application, the relator seeks review of the revocation of his probation. He does not seek to reverse or modify his conviction or sentence. Hence, this is not a writ application relating to a conviction or a sentence, and does not constitute a matter over which this Court has exclusive jurisdiction. It was properly filed originally in the court of appeal. La.Const. 1974, Art. 5 § 5(E). See State v. James Williams, 418 So.2d 1351 . DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO, J., dissent from the order transferring this application. The only thing this application does “relate to” is the sentence, to determine whether it shall be made executory, and this Court has exclusive jurisdiction.