Succession of Brower v. State
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 30, 1977 349 So. 2d 364; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 15, 1971 246 So. 2d 397; La. Ct. App. 2d Cir., April 19, 1956 87 So. 2d 178; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., July 22, 1981 403 So. 2d 773
Succession of Brower v. State, 80 So. 2d 217 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955).
Cited by
- Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections 366 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
- Kelly v. General Mills Supplies, Inc. 331 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
- Torrey v. Simon-Torrey, Inc. 284 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
- Stokes v. Harrison 109 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Succession of Moss 87 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
- Succession of Brower v. State 87 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
- Succession of Brower 84 So. 2d 191 La. 1955
- Succession of Brower v. State 80 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Opinion text
On Petition for Rehearing. PER CURIAM. lOur attention has been called to an inaccurate statement in our decree which we desire to correct. Therein we said: “In support of the decision overruling the plea of prescription, counsel for the State argues Act 35 of 1938 was not intended to apply to inheritance taxes, but only to taxes which currently become due without necessity of legal proceedings to fix ‘ the amount of the taxes.” The sentence should have read: “In support of the decision overruling the plea of prescription, counsel for the State argues inheritance taxes must be determined in judicial proceedings whereas other taxes affected by Act 35 of 1938' are prescribed in amount by provisions of the act imposing the tax.” The correction .herein made does not in any wise affect the views of this court as expressed in our original decree.