Alexander v. Alexander
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 19, 1971 248 So. 2d 58; La., May 15, 1881 33 La. Ann. 910
Alexander v. Alexander, 347 So. 2d 305 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977).
The holding in the court’s own words
2d , we hold (ás we indicated obiter in Marchese v. Schulte, La.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Galjour 215 La. 553
- Mitchell v. Schulte 235 So. 2d 605
Opinion text
REDMANN, Judge. Just as a prior civil proceeding for alimony and child support in the district court does not pre-empt the juvenile court’s criminal non-support jurisdiction, State v. Galjour, 1949, 215 La. 553 , 41 So.2d 215 , we hold (ás we indicated obiter in Marchese v. Schulte, La.App. 4 Cir. 1970, 235 So.2d 605 ) that a prior criminal non-support proceeding in juvenile court does not pre-empt the district court’s civil jurisdiction over alimony and child support. The trial court’s contrary ruling is reversed.