DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jefferson v. Morton Salt Co., 436 So. 2d 456.

35 citing documents.

  • State v. Williams 53 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Rando 848 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Adams 779 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Blanchard 749 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Mitchell 731 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Wilson 672 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Solomon 664 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    2317 , 2322—23, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
  • State v. Smith 663 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Byrd, 568 So.2d at 554 .
  • State v. Brown 647 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. McLemore 640 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    2317, 2322-23 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
  • State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
  • State v. Niel 640 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    2317, 2322-23 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); "
  • State v. Byrd 568 So. 2d 554 La. 1990
    2317, 2322-23 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); (La.
  • State v. Kreitz 560 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Fontenot 550 So. 2d 179 La. 1989
    2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); (La.
  • State v. Rattler 532 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    The magistrate properly made “a practical common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit, there [was] a fair probability that evidence of a crime [would] be found in a particular place.”
  • State v. Scott 530 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Ford 525 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has followed Illinois v. Gates, supra
  • State v. Taylor 525 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Duron 524 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    citing Illinois v. Gates, supra.
  • State v. Jackson 508 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    citing Illinois v. Gates, supra.
  • State v. Lingle 483 So. 2d 608 La. 1986
    Furthermore, the majority’s observation, , that the “identification and apprehension of the offender needed to be accomplished with all possible haste” is irrelevant to the issue at hand: whether the magistrate had sufficient information from the reconstructed affidavit to support the finding of probable cause.
  • State v. Rodriguez 476 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Williams 457 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
  • State v. Wood 457 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Roberson 454 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Moran 451 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
  • State v. Morace 446 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Westfall 446 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    State v. Brooks, ___ So.2d ___ (La.1984).
  • State v. Olsen 446 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    (Emphasis in original) citing Illinois v. Gates, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Morris 444 So. 2d 1200 La. 1984
    (inadvertent material misstatements, rather than omissions, in search warrant affidavit at issue).
  • State v. Lewis 442 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Granier 442 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Dunn 442 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    subsequent to the trial court’s decision in this case, cited Gates as authority for the abandonment of the Aguilar-Spinelli test.
  • Jefferson v. Morton Salt Co. 436 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Considering the application of Ernest Jefferson for a rehearing, and considering the order of the Louisiana Supreme Court, , it is ordered: Ernest Jefferson is granted a rehearing, and this matter is remanded to the trial court for the taking of additional evidence relative to plaintiffs surgery.