Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 444 So. 2d 1243.

20 citing documents.

Harris v. Union National Fire Insurance Co. 175 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1st Cir.1983) writ denied, Thus, a trial judge’s ruling granting an amendment to the pleadings will not be disturbed,on appeal unless an abuse of discretion has occurred that indicates a possibility of resulting injustice.
Carter ex rel. Carter v. East St. John Elementary School 105 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1st Cir.1983), writ denied, and cases cited therein.
State v. Stubbs 793 So. 2d 1254 La. 2001
see also Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573, p. 2 (La.10/4/96), .
State v. Suthon 746 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
we should nonetheless treat the appeal as a timely writ application.
State v. Cureaux 736 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Bell v. Ayio 731 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
1st Cir.1983), writ denied, (La.App.
State v. Walker 645 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Jacomine 624 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Hudson 617 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Jure v. Raviotta 612 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Am. Gen. Fire & Cas. Co. v. La Wakr's Comp. Second Injury Bd. 604 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1983), writ denied, (La.
Knight v. First Guar. Bank 577 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1st Cir.1983), writ denied
State v. Darville 573 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Chiles 569 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Chiles 514 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Encalade 505 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Davis 505 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Ferguson v. DeSoto Parish School Bd. 467 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
1st Cir.1983), writ denied, (La.
State v. Hall 454 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Although defendant does not have a right of appeal, we will treat his timely "appeal" as an application for a writ of review.
State v. Benoit 446 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Although appellant does not have the right of appeal herein, under the Supreme Court’s we will treat defendant’s timely appeal as an application for a writ of review.