DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Clark, 434 So. 2d 404.

23 citing documents.

  • Odom v. Fair 147 So. 3d 1215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Inc., McBride v. XYZ Ins., supra.
  • Theresa St. Julien v. Julie Walters Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 9/17/08), -29 (emphasis added), the second circuit, determining the defendants’ liability for a stray dog which had been kept on their property and ventured onto a roadway causing a serious motorcycle accident, reasoned that: (La.
  • Julien v. Landry 94 So. 3d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    2 Cir. 9/17/08), -29 (emphasis added), the second circuit, determining the defendants’ liability for a stray dog which had been kept on their property and ventured onto a roadway causing a serious motorcycle accident, reasoned that: the court found the owners of a bull strictly liable for an accident that occurred when the bull was in the custody of Louisiana State University Dairy Improvement Center.
  • Holland v. Teague 996 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • McBride v. XYZ Insurance 935 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • Pepper v. Triplet 864 So. 2d 181 La. 2004
    Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Co-op., Inc.
  • Miller v. Martin 838 So. 2d 761 La. 2003
    See Foster v. Destin Trading Corp., 96-0803 (La.5/30/97), (finding that an owner has a non-delegable duty to maintain a seaworthy vessel); (finding, prior to the 1996 tort reform amendments, that an owner has a non-delegable duty to keep his building and its appurtenances in repair); Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Co-op., Inc., (finding, prior to the 1996 tort reform amendment, that an owner has a non-delegable duty to prevent his animal from injuring others).
  • Prine v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 749 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • Dubois v. Economy Fire & Cas. Co. 715 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Inc., W. Crawford, "Presumed Fault for Injuries by Animals and Children," 36 La.
  • Doughty v. Insured Lloyds Ins. Co. 576 So. 2d 461 La. 1991
    See Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Cooperative, Inc.
  • Andrade v. Shiers 564 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • Boyer v. Seal 534 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Howard v. Allstate Ins. Co. 520 So. 2d 715 La. 1988
    Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Cooperative, Inc.
  • Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Cooperative, Inc. 512 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    In Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Cooperative, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the owners of a domestic animal (a bull) are strictly liable for damages inflicted by it regardless of custody.
  • Howard v. Allstate Ins. Co. 510 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Cooperative, Inc.
  • Goutierrez v. R & J Quarterhorse Stables 509 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Cooperative, Inc.
  • Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Co-Op., Inc. 496 So. 2d 275 La. 1986
    Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Cooperative, Inc.
  • Rozell v. LA. ANIMAL BREEDERS CO-OP., INC. 486 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Dotson v. Matthews 480 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Campos v. Gerald 460 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2317 2 and 2321 3 The Louisiana Supreme Court succinctly set forth the obligations of an owner-custodian and a -408 (La.1983), as follows: According to Loescher [v. Parr ], “Article 2317 embodies the concept of the legal fault of the guardian of a thing for the damage caused by the defect of his thing.” 324 So.2d [441] at 448 [La.1975].
  • Parr v. Head 442 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Cooperative, et al.
  • State v. Clark 442 So. 2d 1129 La. 1983
  • Rozell v. Louisiana Animal Breeders Cooperative, Inc. 451 So. 2d 1070 La. 1983
    Correction for opinion published at at page 408 of vote of DENNIS and LEMMON, JJ.