Krieg v. Sciortino
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 30, 1981 402 So. 2d 784; La. Ct. App. 5th Cir., March 15, 1977 343 So. 2d 1216; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 19, 1971 247 So. 2d 908; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 18, 1955 81 So. 2d 62; La. Ct. App. 5th Cir., April 10, 1922 5 Pelt. 665; La., May 15, 1881 33 La. Ann. 923
Krieg v. Sciortino, 341 So. 2d 575 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977).
Cited by
- Alaimo v. Hepinstall 370 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Alexander v. Williams 205 So. 2d 456
Opinion text
ON MOTION TO DISMISS Before LEMMON, STOULIG and BEER, JJ. PER CURIAM. This matter comes before us by reason of motions to dismiss filed in behalf of plaintiff-appellee. An examination of the record indicates that defendant-appellant did not file a verification of his answer until three days after filing the bond as security for the appeal. Thus, there was no verification in the *576 record which is properly before us on appeal, and there has been no timely compliance with the oath requirement of C.C.P. Article 4735 (see Alexander v. Williams,, La.App., 205 So.2d 456 ), and the suspensive appeal must be dismissed at appellant’s cost. It is so ordered. APPEAL DISMISSED.