Norwood v. Burford
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., October 7, 1981 405 So. 2d 631; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 27, 1922 5 Pelt. 855; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 30, 1971 251 So. 2d 514
Norwood v. Burford, 83 So. 2d 570 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955).
Cited by
- Upshaw v. Madden 209 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Myers v. Carolina Casualty Co. 167 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Resolute Insurance Co. v. Canadian Indemnity Co. 111 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Fulco v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company 110 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
- Fulco v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. 110 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Thomas v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 99 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Opinion text
On Motion for Rehearing PER CURIAM. The medical expense incurred by or on behalf of the plaintiff was found by this court to be $651.50 instead of $346 as found by the district court. Proper allowance was made the intervenor as the compensation insurance carrier of plaintiff’s employer for this additional expenditure of $305.-50. It is obvious that plaintiff’s allowance on this item should likewise have been increased. Accordingly, our decree should be and is hereby corrected to the extent of in *575 creasing the principal award in favor of the plaintiff, Ross Norwood, against the defendants, James Burford and Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, in solido, from $7,662.43 to $7,967.93. The application for rehearing is denied.