DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jewell v. Thompson, 446 So. 2d 1228.

15 citing documents.

  • Theophilus Rose v. Bernard Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied, ” Louisiana Civil Code Article 1478 states that “[a] donation inter vivos or mortis causa shall be declared null upon proof that it is the product of fraud or duress.” 10 Because Rose is related to Johnson by consanguinity, Johnson was required to pro
  • Rose v. Johnson 940 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied, "
  • MacK v. Evans 804 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied
  • Allen v. Allen 642 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
  • Autin v. Autin 617 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    2nd Cir.1984), writs denied
  • First Downtown Dev. v. Cimochowski 613 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    App. 2d Cir.1984), writ denied LSA-C.C.
  • State v. Jones 588 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    App. 1st Cir.1983), writ denied, the court held that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial following a police officers remark during cross-examination regarding another crime alleged to have been committed by the defendant.
  • State v. Sylvas 558 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    App. 1st Cir.1983), writ denied
  • SHREVERPORT GR. EMPIRE BROAD., INC. v. Chicoine 528 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    5th Cir. 1985), writ granted , affirmed writ denied (La.App.
  • Thibodeaux v. Thibodeaux 511 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    App. 2d Cir.), writ denied
  • Frazier v. Frazier 499 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied
  • Hardin v. Williams 478 So. 2d 1214 La. 1985
  • State v. Rogers 468 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    1st Cir.1983), writ denied
  • Hardin v. Williams 468 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2nd Cir.1984), writ denied, the Court rejected appellant’s contention that the matrimonial agreement was invalid as to form because “none of the signatories to the agreement could consistently affirm that they signed in the presence of each other”, reasoning that “All 2234 requires is that the notary and witnesses be present when each
  • State v. Fournier 465 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985