Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tasker, 450 So. 2d 644.

114 citing documents.

  • State v. Cormier 649 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, (citing Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5th Cir.1983)).
  • State v. Reynaga 643 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    App. 1 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Chapman 643 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Gaudet 638 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Brown 636 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Cooper 635 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Brown 618 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    In a factually similar case, the defendant beat his victim into unconsciousness and left her on ground which sloped down into a canal.
  • State v. Lyles 617 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    1st Cir.1984), writ den.
  • State v. Joseph 613 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Zeno 610 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Williams 608 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied, citing Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5th Cir.1983).
  • State v. Hall 602 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    1st Cir.), writ denied (1984).
  • State v. Jones 598 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    -647 (La.1984); -1164 (La.1979).
  • State v. Coleman 593 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Govan 593 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Hookfin 601 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Batiste 594 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Clark 589 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Williams 588 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Riley 587 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    1st Cir.), writ denied a glass vial containing cocaine residue was found in a drawer in the defendant's bedroom; the court found him to be in constructive possession of the cocaine despite his claim that he had never seen the vial before and the fact that his brother also had regular access to the residence.
  • State v. Harris 585 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Collins 584 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Ventress 578 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Fontenot 578 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Meshell 567 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Kalathakis 563 So. 2d 228 La. 1990
    stated that legal cause in criminal cases requires that the defendant's act was a "substantial factor in bringing about the forbidden result".
  • State v. Chambers 563 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Bartholomew 562 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    the First Circuit found a sentence of five years at hard labor for possession of cocaine to run concurrently with five and seven year sentences for conviction of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute not excessive.
  • State v. Clark 558 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Morgan 557 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Papillion 556 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    1 Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Marquez 555 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    1st Cir.1984), writ den.
  • State v. Higginbotham 554 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. King 554 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied, citing Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5th Cir.1983).
  • State v. Johnson 553 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Winzer 545 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Thompson 543 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Morrison 542 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Martin 539 So. 2d 1235 La. 1989
  • State v. Patterson 540 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Weilbaecher 534 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. LeBouef 532 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    So this is the sequence of events and one cannot be separated from the other.” (La.
  • State v. Polkey 529 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Racca 525 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Simmons 518 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Magee 517 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Orgeron 512 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. White 508 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    1 Cir. 1984), writ denied
  • State v. Kyzar 509 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. McCullough 503 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    1st Cir.1984), writ den., ” In the instant case, it is undisputed that defendant not only drove the involved vehicle, but that he insisted the location of the deal be changed because a friend of his had recently been arrested while “dealing” at the car wash location.