Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tharpe, 463 So. 2d 600.
-
State of Louisiana v. Levi Joseph Garrick
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
1 Cir. 1984), writ denied
-
State v. Garrick
879 So. 2d 401
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
App. 1 Cir.1984), writ denied
-
State v. Garrick
879 So. 2d 401
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1 Cir.1984), writ denied
-
State v. Will
860 So. 2d 140
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1st Cir.1984), writ denied, the phrase “anything of apparent present or prospective value” includes the situation where an offender forces a victim to transport the offender to a particular location.
-
State v. Woodard
799 So. 2d 701
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
1st Cir.1984), , writ denied, , grant of habeas corpus reversed on other grounds 39 F.3d 607 , certiorari denied, 514 U.S. 1069 , 115 S.Ct.
-
State v. Jagers
786 So. 2d 284
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
1st Cir.1984), writ denied, the phrase “anything of apparent present or prospective value” includes the situation where an offender forces a victim to transport the offender to a particular location.
-
State v. Howard
751 So. 2d 783
La. 1999
1st Cir.1984) (no error for prosecutor to read statute defining charge during voir dire or to explain the concept of general and specific criminal intent to the panel), writ denied, (La.
-
State v. Cyrex
746 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
1 Cir.1984), writ denied, (1985).
-
State v. Guillory
715 So. 2d 400
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
1st Cir.1984), writ denied, each of which utilized the three-part test of Castaneda in evaluating a claim of racially discriminatory selection of grand jury forepersons.
-
State v. Ellis
677 So. 2d 617
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
1st Cir. 1984), writ denied (1985); (La.App.
-
State v. Wilson
672 So. 2d 716
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
-
State v. Boutte
635 So. 2d 617
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
3d Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.
-
State v. Taylor
635 So. 2d 416
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
3d Cir.1984), writ denied ( (La.App.
-
State v. Barker
628 So. 2d 168
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied but urges that the instant statement was "such an incorrect statement * * * on so important a concept" that reversal is in order.
-
State v. Smith
625 So. 2d 620
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1st Cir. 1984), writ denied
-
State v. Roblow
623 So. 2d 51
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
-
State v. Butler
615 So. 2d 496
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
-
State v. Thomas
609 So. 2d 1078
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
2d Cir. 1984), writ denied, (La.
-
State v. Hurst
606 So. 2d 965
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
1 Cir.1984), writ denied
-
State v. Widenhouse
582 So. 2d 1374
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied, , the court found that there was no error in allowing a forensic psychiatrist *1386 who taught forensics to testify about the differences in the applicable Louisiana standard and the federal standard for insanity.
-
State v. Lee
577 So. 2d 134
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
-
State v. Young
569 So. 2d 570
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
1st Cir.1984), writ denied, *574 (La.1985), each of which utilized the three-part test of Castaneda in evaluating a claim of racially discriminatory selection of grand jury forepersons.
-
State v. Valery
532 So. 2d 536
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied
-
State v. Hodges
526 So. 2d 1275
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
1st Cir. 1984), writ denied (La.App.
-
State v. Domingue
517 So. 2d 346
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
1st Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
-
State v. Fisher
507 So. 2d 1263
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied
-
State v. Pleasant
489 So. 2d 1005
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1st Cir.1984); writ denied
-
Boudreaux v. State, Department of Public Safety
479 So. 2d 416
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
2d *418 Cir.1984), writ denied
-
State v. Boudreaux
471 So. 2d 1021
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1st Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.
-
State v. Robinson
471 So. 2d 1035
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1st Cir.1984), writ denied