Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. Bersch v. Maggio, 460 So. 2d 604.

37 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Pegues 43 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Caples 938 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Belgard v. American Freightways, Inc. 755 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
1 Cir.), writ denied, the First Circuit noted that substantial certainty is not an alternative to intentional act but a method of proving that the act was intentional.
Louisiana Farms v. LA. Dept. of Wildlife 685 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
5 Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
State v. Banford 653 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
App. 1 Cir.1984), writ denied, the First Circuit found that because defendant was a principal and cocon-spirator with co-defendant Bell in the commission of the armed robbery, he was responsible for co-defendant Bell’s acts of killing the two victims during the perpetration of the robbery, and therefore was guilty of second degree murder
State v. Lockhart 629 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
App. 1st Cir.), writ denied
Armstead v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 618 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
Holden v. Holliday 597 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
1st Cir.), writ denied, in order to avoid the exclusive remedy of worker’s compensation, a defendant must act with an intent to injure the plaintiff.
Fannin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 594 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
(1st Cir.1984) writ denied
State v. Jones 593 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Lamark 584 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Gray v. McInnis Bros. Const., Inc. 569 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
1st Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.
Bonin v. Bon Electrical Contractors, Inc. 567 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
1 Cir.1984), writ den., in sup *769 port of his “zone of danger” theory.
Dycus v. Martin Marietta Corp. 568 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
1st Cir.1984), writ denied the First Circuit noted that substantial certainty is not an alternative to intentional act but a method of proving that the act was intentional.
Reeder v. Laks Corp. 555 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Isaac 542 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied, the defendant claimed he did not know his rights.
State v. Warren 536 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Bourgeois v. Jordan 527 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
1 Cir.1984), writ den., (La.App.
State v. Robinson 525 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Spears 525 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Brady 524 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Ehlinger v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 517 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
5th Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Burge 515 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Moten 510 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
Snow v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 492 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1st Cir.1984), writ denied (La.
State v. Kent 489 So. 2d 1354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Williams 486 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Lucas 482 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
Varnado v. Sanders 477 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
5th Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Bell 477 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Boudreaux 471 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1st Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.
Gallant v. Transcontinental Drilling Co. 471 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
1st Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Williams 471 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Kirkley 470 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1st Cir. 1984), writ denied
State v. Mullins 464 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied
State v. Munzy 464 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1st Cir. 1984), writ denied