Fontenot v. Hanover Insurance Co.
Fontenot v. Hanover Insurance Co., 465 So. 2d 678 (La. 1985).
Cited by
- Fontenot v. Hanover Ins. Co. 473 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- Fontenot v. Hanover Insurance Co. 466 So. 2d 1296 La. 1985
- Fontenot v. Hanover Insurance Co. 465 So. 2d 679 La. 1985
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Scott v. Corkern 231 La. 368
- American Capital Corp. v. Falk 181 So. 2d 241
- American Capital Corp. v. Falk 248 La. 1032
- Hewitt v. Williams 17 So. 269
- Fontenot v. Hanover Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 743
- State v. Murray 464 So. 2d 15
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. NO. 85-C-0055 is granted with the following order: The instrument in question constitutes a pledge and not an assignment. Cf. Scott v. Corkern, 231 La. 368 , 91 So.2d 569 (1956). The pledgee is not an indispensable party. American Capital Corporation v. Falk, 181 So.2d 241 (La.App. 4 Cir.1965); cert. den., no error of law, 248 La. 1032 , 183 So.2d 653 (1966). Hewitt v. Williams, 47 La.Ann. 742 , 17 So. 269 (1894). The judgment of the court of appeal, 465 So.2d 743 (1984), is reversed and vacated. The case is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits. No. 85-C-0076 is denied. 464 So.2d 15 (1985). DENNIS, J., dissents from the action.