DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, 467 So. 2d 539.

14 citing documents.

  • MATRIX CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. Patel 973 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    App. 1st Cir.), writs denied, and 541 (La.
  • Watson v. Nelson 702 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    1 Cir.), writs denied, , 541 (La.1985), held that the presence in the record of a copy of a letter dated May 8, 1984, addressed to and received by plaintiffs' counsel, with a "c.c."
  • Tullis v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 670 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Voelkel v. State 671 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    1st Cir.), writs denied sub nom., and
  • Beagle v. Beagle 657 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    1 Cir.), writs denied, , (La.
  • Stovall v. Shell Oil Co. 577 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    3rd Cir.1985), writ denied
  • Johnson v. American Southern Ins. Co. 569 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    3 Cir.1985), writ den., : "A defendant's action or conduct is a cause-in-fact of harm to another, if but for its conduct the accident or harm would not have occurred, or if its conduct was a substantial factor in bringing about the harm.
  • Distinguished In re Layrisson 558 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    1st Cir.1985), writ denied, and 541 (La.1985), is easily distinguishable from the present case.
  • Davis v. State Farm Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    3rd Cir.1985), writ denied
  • Lirette v. State Farm Insurance Co. 554 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    1st Cir.1988), writ denied, , writ denied
  • Guidry v. Sam Grimmett, Inc. 557 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • Fontenot v. Fontenot 546 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • Gerald v. Odom 506 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    1st Cir.1985), writ denied , 541 (La.1985), the court held that a letter to the plaintiffs from the clerk informing them of the date judgment was signed and containing a “c.c.” notation did not meet the requirement of a certificate showing the date of mailing.
  • Guillot v. Sandoz 497 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    3rd Cir. 1985), writ denied