DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Payne, 464 So. 2d 314.

18 citing documents.

  • State v. Wallace 143 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3rd Cir.1984); writ denied
  • State of Louisiana v. James Stubblefield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 1984), writ denied, ).
  • State v. Morrison 55 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    3d Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Morgan 34 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    3d Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State of Louisiana v. H.J.L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 1984), writ denied, the defendant argued that the concept of penetration required proof of actual penetration of the vagina itself.
  • State v. H.J.L. 999 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3 Cir.1984), writ denied, the defendant argued that the concept of penetration required proof of actual penetration of the vagina itself.
  • State v. HJL 999 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir.1984), writ denied, the defendant argued that the concept of penetration required proof of actual penetration of the vagina itself.
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 1984), writ denied, noted, "[a]ny penetration, however slight, of the aperture of the female genitalia, even its external features, is sufficient."
  • State v. Ross 861 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir.1984), writ denied, noted, "[a]ny penetration, however slight, of the aperture of the female genitalia, even its external features, is sufficient."
  • State v. Self 719 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    App. 3 Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Williams 688 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    3 Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. MacKey 687 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.1984), writ denied, (holding that the defendant's testimony that he shot the victim in the head and chest at close range was sufficient to infer that the defendant had the specific intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm).
  • State v. Wilson 677 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Porter 615 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    3d Cir.1984), writ denied, to mean that "any penetration, however slight, of the aperture of the female genitalia, even its external features, is sufficient."
  • State v. Lewis 577 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    3d Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Williams 515 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    3 Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Anderson 499 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    3rd Cir. 1984); writ denied
  • State v. Delahoussaye 479 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985