Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Guidry, 481 So. 2d 1329.

13 citing documents.

LHO New Orleans LM, L.P. v. MHI Leasco New Orleans, Inc. 869 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
2 Cir.1985), unit not considered, the Court held: Arbitration is a mode of settling differences through the investigation and determination by one or more individuals appointed for that purpose.
Haase Construction Co. v. Strohmeyer 738 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
2 Cir.1985), writ not considered, the court concluded that the defendant failed to plead any of the statutory bases for |invacating an award of arbitration.
Conagra Poultry Co. v. Collingsworth 705 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
App. 2d Cir.1985), writ not cons., (1986).
Maldonado v. Louisiana Superdome Com'n 687 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
App. 1st Cir.1985), writ not considered, the Superdome contends that the standard of review to be applied here is "a sufficiency and preponderance of the evidence, not manifest error," at least as to those issues for which the trial court relied upon deposition testimony.
Woodrow Wilson Const. v. Mmr-Radon 684 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
2 Cir.1985), writ not considered, the court held: Arbitration is a mode of settling differences through the investigation and determination by one or more individuals appointed for that purpose.
STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES v. Dorsey 665 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
1st Cir.1985), writ not considered, (La.
City of Sulphur v. Southern Builders 579 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
App. 2 Cir.1985), writ not considered
Winford Co. v. Webster Gravel & Asphalt 571 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
1st Cir.1985), writ not considered
Godeau v. PICHELOUP CONST. CO., INC. 567 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
2nd Cir.1985); writ not considered, (La.
SEA TANG FISH., INC. v. You'll See Sea Foods, Inc. 569 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
1st Cir.1985), writ not considered
State v. Gray 526 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
3rd Cir.1984), writ denied
N. Cent. Util. v. E. Columbia Water Dist. 516 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
2d Cir.1985), writ not considered we reversed the trial court judgment and ordered that the award be recognized and confirmed.
Tucker v. Kelly 506 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
1st Cir.1985), writ not considered

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by