Womack v. Standard Accident Insurance
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 10, 1971 255 So. 2d 477; La., May 15, 1882 34 La. 864; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., February 3, 1982 411 So. 2d 81
Womack v. Standard Accident Insurance, 90 So. 2d 481 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956).
Cited by
- Wilson v. Standard Accident Insurance 92 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Stroud v. Standard Accident Insurance Co. 90 So. 2d 477
Opinion text
AYRES, Judge. This is a companion suit to that of Stroud v. Standard Accident Insurance Co., 90 So.2d 477 . Plaintiff, H. F. Womack, was the owner of the truck involved' in the aforesaid action and which was damaged' in thé accident involved therein. There we held that *482 the accident was due solely and proximately to the fault and negligence of the driver of the Ford car collidingvwith plaintiff’s truck. Therefore, there is presented for determination here only- the question .of the extent of damages sustained to the truck. The trial court concluded from the evidence that the extent of the damage was $438.97 and condemned defendant accordingly. From that- judgment defendant appealed. Plaintiff answered the appeal, praying that the judgment be increased to $548. Neither appellee 'nor appellant points out any error in the award. ' Our own review1 of the record fails to disclose any error warranting a modification of -the judgment. ‘ Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is-affirmed at appellant’s cost. Affirmed.