Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite American Bank v. Perdido Bay Partnership, 502 So. 2d 1018.

20 citing documents.

  • In re Laudumiey 849 So. 2d 515 La. 2003
    The procedural nature of the rule is illustrated by our decisions in In re: White, 00-2732 (La.4/25/01), , and Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff, in which we held that the minimum period for applying for readmission may be extended or otherwise modified at our discretion.
  • In re Morphis 831 So. 2d 934 La. 2002
    See In re: White, 00-2732 (La.4/25/01), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff
  • In re Gros 815 So. 2d 799 La. 2002
    However, citing Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff, the board recognized this court has the authority to extend the minimum period which must expire before respondent may apply for readmission.
  • In Re Parker 815 So. 2d 794 La. 2002
    However, the board concluded this court has the authority to extend the minimum period which must expire before respondent may apply for readmission.
  • In Re White 791 So. 2d 602 La. 2001
  • In re Welcker 753 So. 2d 177 La. 2000
    Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff
  • In re Fergurson 746 So. 2d 1269 La. 1999
    In re: Parker, 97-2351 (La.1/30/98), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff
  • In re Williams 744 So. 2d 621 La. 1999
    Louisiana State Bar *624 Ass’n v. Krasnoff, (La.
  • In re Quaid 740 So. 2d 104 La. 1999
    However, as recognized in Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff, this court has the authority to extend the minimum period for readmission.
  • In re Castro 737 So. 2d 701 La. 1999
    Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff
  • In re Irby 735 So. 2d 624 La. 1999
    Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff
  • In re Caver 733 So. 2d 1208 La. 1999
    Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff
  • In re Ferrand 731 So. 2d 874 La. 1999
    Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff
  • In Re Parker 705 So. 2d 736 La. 1998
  • In re Welcker 701 So. 2d 186 La. 1997
    See Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff
  • In re Gros 699 So. 2d 384 La. 1997
    Nonetheless, Uit found no reason why this court’s opinion in Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff, should not continue to apply.
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Amberg 553 So. 2d 448 La. 1989
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Chatelain 545 So. 2d 1000 La. 1989
    12 this Court considered charges against an attorney who had been previously disbarred in a separate proceeding.
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Alker 530 So. 2d 1138 La. 1988
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Krasnoff 515 So. 2d 780 La. 1987
    of Incorp., art. 14 § 7; art. 15 §§ 6, 12(b)(1)