Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stae ex rel. Brooks v. Shea, 491 So. 2d 20.

16 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Robert Javontie Marks La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
App. 3rd Cir.), writ denied, ( La.
State v. Carper 107 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
3d Cir.1986), writ denied, wherein the appeals court considered the admissibility of a videotape of a child victim in which some leading questions had been asked under La.
In the Matter of State Ex Rel. Lw 40 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3d Cir.), writ denied, ("The State offered the videotape in evidence as the direct testimony of the child and, at the conclusion of the videotape, tendered the child in person for cross-examination by defendant....
State ex rel. L.W. 40 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3d Cir.), writ denied, (“The State offered the videotape in evidence as the direct testimony of the child and, at the conclusion of the videotape, tendered the child in person for cross-examination by defendant....
State Ex Rel. Am 994 So. 2d 1277 La. 2008
the defendant's constitutional right of confrontation was not violated since he was given an opportunity to cross-examine the witness against him."), writ denied
State v. In the Interest of A.M. 994 So. 2d 1277 La. 2008
the defendant’s constitutional right of confrontation was not violated since he was given an opportunity to cross-examine the witness against him.”), writ denied
State v. Borden 986 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 1986), writ denied, (La.
State v. Roberts 966 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
3d Cir.1986), writ denied, considered the issue of the competency of a videotape of a child victim in which some leading questions *121 had been asked under LSA-R.S.
State v. Watson 900 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
3d Cir.1986), writ denied, considered the issue of the competency of a videotape of a child victim in which some leading questions had been asked under LSA-R.S.
State v. Guerra 834 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
3d Cir.1986), writ denied, considered the issue of competency of a videotape of a child victim in which some leading questions had been asked (under La.
State v. Duke 625 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
3d Cir.), writ denied, we addressed a similar issue.
State v. Isaac 544 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
3 Cir. 1986), writ denied, considered the issue of competency of a videotape of a child victim in which some leading questions had been asked (under LSA-R.S.
State in Interest of RC 514 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
3d Cir. 1986), writ denied Comment, Televised Testimony vs. The Confrontation Clause ...
State v. Schenck 513 So. 2d 1159 La. 1987
3d Cir.), writ denied, (Defendant was convicted of sexual battery for penetration of a seven year old child's sexual organs and received a three year suspended sentence with one year in the parish work release program.); (La.App.
Distinguished State v. In the Interest of R.C. 494 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
3d Cir.1986), writ denied for the proposition that LSA-R.S.
Distinguished State v. RC 494 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
3d Cir.1986), writ denied for the proposition that LSA-R.S.