Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Woods, 512 So. 2d 839.

111 citing documents.

Mallery v. International Harvester Co. 690 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Jaeger v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 682 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Hataway v. Jeep Corp. 679 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc. 676 So. 2d 89 La. 1996
The defendant argues that even if the state standard of review is applicable, the appellate court erred in failing to conduct a
Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc. 663 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
the deference that Louisiana appellate courts normally accord the trier of fact's factual findings under the manifest error standard of review is not applicable in this case because the trial court failed to articulate the legal theories or evidentiary facts on which its factual conclusions were based.
Black v. Gorman-Rupp 655 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Hines v. Remington Arms Co., Inc. 648 So. 2d 331 La. 1994
Delery v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America 643 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Myers v. American Seating Co. 637 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
1st Cir.1991), for the definition of "normal use," and John Kennedy, A Primer on the Louisiana Products Liability Act, 49 La.L.Rev.
Kirby v. Langston's Furniture & Appliance 631 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Hines v. Remington Arms Co., Inc. 630 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State Farm v. Wrap-On Co. 626 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Frederick v. Woman's Hosp. of Acadiana 626 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Goins v. Galion Mfg. Co. 626 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Thibodeaux v. Century Manufacturing Co. 625 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Johnston v. Hartford Ins. Co. 623 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Berthelot v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 623 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Simeon v. Doe 618 So. 2d 848 La. 1993
where the presumption was rebutted by evidence that a warning would not have been heeded.
Jessen v. Dr. Kenneth W. Wimberly, DDS 610 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Gauthier v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. 608 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Johnson v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. 607 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Distinguished Spott v. Otis Elevator Co. 601 So. 2d 1355 La. 1992
Easton v. Chevron Industries, Inc. 602 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Daigle v. Audi of America, Inc. 598 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1991), for the definition of "normal use," and Kennedy.
Sharkey v. Sterling Drug, Inc. 600 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Page v. Gilbert 598 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
held that parking a car in a barn, resulting in the catalytic converter exhaust system causing a fire, was "normal" use of a vehicle.
Moore v. Chrysler Corp. 596 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Id., at 114-115 ; Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Thomas v. Clairol Inc. 583 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
In a case written prior to the enactment of the Louisiana Products Liability Act, stated that a manufacturer is required to provide an adequate warning of any danger inherent in the normal use of its product which is not within the knowledge of or obvious to the ordinary user.
Home Insurance Co. v. National Tea Co. 577 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Walker v. Babcock Industries, Inc. 582 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
The LPLA definition is narrower in scope than the term "normal use" of the product which has been defined to encompass "all reasonably foreseeable uses and misuses of the product," in pre-LPLA jurisprudence.
Hale Farms, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Company 580 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Guy v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVEP. 576 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Thompson v. PetroUnited Terminals, Inc., (La.App.
Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd. 572 So. 2d 571 La. 1991
Leday v. Clairol, Inc. 571 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Cannon v. Cavalier Corp. 572 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Reilly v. Dynamic Exploration, Inc. 571 So. 2d 140 La. 1990
Hunt, supra ; Chappuis, supra .
Roberts v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 566 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Berry v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 565 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Manuel v. Odeco, Inc. 563 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Shipley v. REC. & PARK COM'N FOR PARISH OF EBR 558 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Pardue v. Stephens 558 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Clement v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, (La.App.
Graves v. Porterfield 555 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Winstead v. Ed's Live Catfish & Seafood, Inc. 554 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
McCoy v. Otis Elevator Co., Inc. 546 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Levi v. SW La. Elec. Membership Co-Op. 542 So. 2d 1081 La. 1989
Leday v. Aztec Corp. 544 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Halphen, supra ; LeBleu, supra .
Weber v. Caterpillar MacHinery Corp. 542 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Ingram v. Caterpillar MacHinery Corp. 535 So. 2d 723 La. 1988
Thompson v. PetroUnited Terminals, Inc. 536 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Boubel v. Gilardi 532 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by