DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reece v. Reece, 503 So. 2d 496.

13 citing documents.

  • Bentley v. Fanguy 3 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Powell v. Fuentes 786 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    3d Cir.1987), writ denied, (La.
  • Smith v. Cutter Biological 770 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    also note the distinction between amended petitions and supplemental petitions.
  • Meissner v. Meissner 707 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    3 Cir.), writ denied (La.App.
  • Remet v. Martin 705 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    3 Cir.), writ denied, the hospital was not vicariously liable for the acts of a non-employee radiologist.
  • Bankston v. Alexandria Neurosurgical Clinic 659 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Koenig v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 619 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    3rd Cir.1987), writ denied
  • Suire v. Lake Charles Memorial Hosp. 590 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    3d Cir.1987), writ denied, and held that the medically accepted and appropriate procedure of calling in a specialist for a consultation does not subject the treating physician to vicarious liability for the negligence of the consulting specialist.
  • Roberts v. Murphy Oil Corp. 577 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • Parmelee v. Kline 579 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
    3rd Cir.1987), writ denied the third circuit concluded that "two physicians [who] practiced different types of medicine completely independent of each other were not vicariously liable for each other's alleged negligence."
  • Purchase Corp. v. Starkes 560 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    3d Cir.), writ denied, the court honored a North Carolina Deed of Separation as a contract between the parties authorized by North Carolina statutes, although it did not make the deed executory in Louisiana by giving it full faith and credit.
  • Razzaghe-Ashrafi v. Razzaghe-Ashrafi 558 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    3rd Cir.1987), writ denied, (La.
  • Montgomery v. Opelousas General Hosp. 529 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    3rd Cir.1987), writ denied, a panel of this court stated: "Under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, a defendant's negligence is inferred because, under the facts presented, the inference that defendant's negligence caused plaintiff's harm is probable and more plausible than any explanation propounded.