Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Novak v. Texada, 515 So. 2d 807.
- Lougon v. Era Aviation, Inc. 609 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- Smith v. Flotation Services, Inc. 596 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
-
Francis v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.
594 So. 2d 1025
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
3rd Cir.1987), writ denied, Ward v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc., (La.App.
-
Phillips v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
587 So. 2d 200
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
3 Cir.1987), writ denied
-
Broussard v. Delchamps, Inc.
571 So. 2d 855
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Miller v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., writ denied, Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic, writ denied
-
Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
546 So. 2d 267
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
App. 3 Cir.1987), writ den.
- Fuqua v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 542 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
-
Steers v. International Paper Co.
540 So. 2d 1236
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
held that it was proper to inform the jury of the policy limits.
-
Jones v. Lingenfelder
537 So. 2d 1275
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
App. 3d Cir.1987), writ denied, and non-prejudicial error in failing to allow the jury to see the policy limits, Bishop v. Shelter Ins.
-
Ewing v. Aubert
532 So. 2d 876
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
App.3d Cir.), writ denied, Daniel, supra, at 590 .
-
Daniels v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources
532 So. 2d 218
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
3 Cir.1987), writ denied, the plaintiff claimed that the requirements of the informed consent statute must be satisfied prior to administering a routine flu injection.
- Prince v. Conoco, Inc. 529 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988