State v. Taylor.
Also decided on this docket: La., October 9, 1987 513 So. 2d 281
State v. Taylor., 511 So. 2d 1141 (La. 1987).
Cited by
- State v. Taylor 550 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Taylor 513 So. 2d 281 La. 1987
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. Writ denied. Pursuant to an order from this court, the trial judge conducted a pretrial hearing on the admissibility of the attorney-client communications. The evidence credited by the trial judge established that the communications, more probably than not, were made in pursuit of a criminal act of conspiracy to hide the apparent murder weapon and are not protected by the attorney-client privilege. DENNIS, J., concurs but notes that the privilege is still intact and enforceable as to those attorney-client communications not made in furtherance of a criminal act.