Corporation of Vermilionville v. Mouton
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 7, 1963 148 So. 2d 463; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., October 7, 1931 136 So. 902; La., June 15, 1867 70 La. Ann. 360; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., June 18, 1963 154 So. 2d 597
Corporation of Vermilionville v. Mouton, 28 La. Ann. 586 (1876).
The holding in the court’s own words
The judgment rendered by the magistrate’s court we therefore conclude was erroneously rendered.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Opinion text
Taliavbrro, J. The corporation of the town of Vermilionville im-X^osed a license tax of ten dollars for the year 1874 on each attorney at law practicing his profession within the limits of the corporation. The defendant, an attorney at law, refused to pay this license tax, and suit was brought against him by the corporation before a justice of the peace to compel payment, and judgment was rendered in favor of the corporation, and the defendant has appealed. Corporate bodies can exercise only the powers granted to them. In *587 referring to the legislative act incorporating the town of Yermilionville we were unable to find any power, express or implied, granted to the corporation to impose a license tax of any kind. The judgment rendered by the magistrate’s court we therefore conclude was erroneously rendered. It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be annulled • and reversed. It is further ordered that there be judgment in favor of defendant, the plaintiff paying costs in both courts.