Lavedan v. Trinchard
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 19, 1957 99 So. 2d 482; La. Ct. App. 5th Cir., February 2, 1925 1 La. App. 524; La., January 15, 1884 36 La. Ann. 100; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., April 14, 1982 413 So. 2d 352; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 25, 1972 260 So. 2d 52
Lavedan v. Trinchard, 35 La. Ann. 540 (1883).
Opinion text
On Application por a Rehearing. Bermudez, C. J. The cause of alarm on which this application *542 seems to rest is, that in the judgment rendered we have passed on the titles involved. We have done no such thing. We have merely held, that tile position of the opponents is that of defendants in a petitory action, and that they can securely rely on their possession until a better title be shown. We passed simply on a question of form. This leaves the door open for those concerned to institute proper proceedings to revendiente the property and thus have their title declared superior, if such, to that which opponents may assert to it. Application refused.