Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnnie v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development, 558 So. 2d 1379.

15 citing documents.

  • State v. Smith 947 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Broussard 769 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    ermined that “it is the circumstances indicating the intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than the precise timing of an officer’s statements: ‘You are under arrest,’ that are determinative of when an arrest is actually made.” (); [sic]
  • State v. Smith 761 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    rmined that “it is the circumstances indicating the intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than the precise timing' of an officer’s statements: ‘You are under arrest,’ that are determinative of when an arrest is actually made.” (); [sic]
  • State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Smiley 729 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Amos 714 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    etermined that “it is the circumstances indicating intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty- of the accused, rather than the precise timing of an officer’s statements: “You are under arrest,’ that are determinative of when an arrest is actually made.” (); see also
  • State v. Fisher 692 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Lassere 683 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    5th Cir. 10/18/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
  • State v. Short 668 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Simmons 663 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Harris 612 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Edwards 575 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    5th Cir. 1985) (18 months); (La.App.
  • Dumond v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 558 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    A separate opinion will be rendered in Johnnie v. State, Through the Department of Transportation and Development, (La.App.