Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Valley Forge Insurance Co. v. Dynascan Corp., 536 So. 2d 1254.

16 citing documents.

  • Alvin J. Chaisson v. Colby Garrett Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3 Cir. 1988), writ denied
  • Succession of James Oliver Love La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 1988), writ denied, : Any donation inter vivos of a negotiable instrument made on or before the effective date of this Paragraph, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 3 of Title 10 of the Louisiana Statutes of 1950 or the Louisiana Civil Code or any other law o
  • Succession of Love 201 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir.1988), writ denied, (La.
  • Innovative Hospitality Systems, LLC v. Johnny Abraham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    App. 3 Cir. 1988), writ denied
  • In Re Succession of Franklin 968 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    App. 3d Cir.1988), writ denied, the decedent, Salter Walker, gave J.C.
  • Succession of Granger v. Worthington 829 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir.1988), writ denied
  • Thomson v. Thomson 778 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir.1988), writ denied, (La.
  • Davis v. Coregis Ins. Co. 789 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    5 Cir. 1988), writ denied, (La.
  • Bridges v. Bridges 692 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    3 Cir.1988), writ denied, this court stated: *1191 Under Louisiana law, property may be gratuitously disposed of in only two ways: (1) Donations inter vivos (between living persons), or (2) Donations mortis causa (in prospect of death).
  • Mertens v. Mertens 688 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.1988), writ denied, (La.
  • Richard v. Richard 653 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    3d Cir.1988), writ denied
  • Robin v. Finley 597 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    3d Cir.1988), writ denied, (1989).
  • API Supply Co. v. Premier Bank 593 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    3d Cir.1988), writ denied, the Third Circuit held that a cashier’s check is a negotiable instrument pursuant to La.R.S.
  • Fogg v. Fogg 571 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    3d Cir.1988), writ denied
  • Taylor v. Dowden 563 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    5 Cir.1988), writ denied, : "There is no requirement that the party confirming the default must have the testimony reduced to writing or that a note be made of the evidence introduced; when judgment has been rendered and no note of evidence has been made, it is incumbent on the party opposing the judgment to secure a narrative of the
  • Allbritton v. Allbritton 561 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    3rd Cir.1988), writ denied