Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. Holloway v. State, 519 So. 2d 148.

14 citing documents.

City Bar, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. John Bel Edwards, in his … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
App. 1" Cir. 1987), writ denied, ), this court identified a distinction between physical takings of property, By contrast, in order for a taking to be compensable under the Taking Clause of the United States Constitution, it must constitute an actual, permanent invasion of the property, amounting to an appropriation of, and not me
Joseph Robert, Gloria Decuir-Robert, Albert Bierria, Gwendolyn Bierra v. State of Louisiana and Abc Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 1st Cir.1987), writ den[ied].
Boudreaux v. Larpenter 110 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1st Cir.1987), unit denied, this court recognized a distinction between regulatory takings and physical takings of property.
Belle Co. v. State ex rel. Department of Environmental Quality 25 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1st Cir. 1987), writ denied, and Rivet v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development, 93-369 (La.App.
Belle Company, LLC v. Deq 25 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1st Cir. 1987), writ denied, (La.
Major v. Pointe Coupee Parish Police Jury 978 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
1 Cir.1987), writ denied, (La.
Oak Harbor Property Owners' v. Millennium 934 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1 Cir.1987), writ denied, (La.
Dan Rhodes Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
1 Cir. 1987), writ denied, the first circuit held that “a regulatory program that adversely affects property values does not constitute a taking unless it destroys a major portion of the property’s value.” The annexation did not prohibit DRE from leasing the properties 5 at issue; it sim
DAN RHODES ENTER v. City of Lake Charles 857 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
1 Cir.1987), writ denied, the first circuit held that "a regulatory program that adversely affects property values does not constitute a taking unless it destroys a major portion of the property's value."
Avenal v. State 757 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
1 Cir. 12/22/87); writ denied by (La.2/12/88), ; (La.App.
Standard Materials, Inc. v. City of Slidell 700 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
1st Cir.1987), writ denied
STATE, DEPT. OF SOC. SERV. v. New Orleans 676 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
1 Cir.1988) writ denied (1988).
Layne v. City of Mandeville 633 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1st Cir.1987), writ denied
Lakeshore Harbor Condo. Dev. v. City of New Orleans 603 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1987), writ den.