Hines v. Hines
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 14, 1978 355 So. 2d 1047; La., March 15, 1883 35 La. Ann. 336; La. Ct. App. 2d Cir., June 20, 1958 104 So. 2d 236
Hines v. Hines, 419 So. 2d 971 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982).
Cited by
- Hewitt v. Hewitt 486 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- Hines v. Hines 458 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- Stepp v. Stepp 442 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Hines v. Hines 420 So. 2d 980 La. 1982
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Byrd v. Byrd 335 So. 2d 515
Opinion text
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. In an application for rehearing counsel for Mrs. Hines calls our attention to the fact that our opinion which amended the district court judgment to increase the amount of child support is silent as to the date that the increase is to commence. We clarify herein this inadvertent omission, and we now Order, Adjudge, and Decree that the increase in child support referred to is to be effective April 27, 1981, the date upon which Mrs. Hines first filed her petition which included a prayer for custody and child support. Byrd v. Byrd, 335 So.2d 515 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1976). Defendant-curator is to be given credit for any voluntary or court ordered child support payments made by him since April 27, 1981. With this Per Curiam Mrs. Hines’ application for rehearing is denied.