Successions of Vives
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 26, 1982 415 So. 2d 631; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 20, 1958 104 So. 2d 248; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., October 30, 1922 7 Pelt. 184; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., November 10, 1977 352 So. 2d 732
Successions of Vives, 35 La. Ann. 371 (1883).
Opinion text
On Motion to Dismiss. The opinion of the Court was delivered by Todd, J. This controversy grows out of an opposition to the final account of the administrator of these successions. The opponents, creditors of the deceased, are appellants from a judgment dismissing their oppositions. There is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground of want of jurisdiction raMone materiw. The fund to be distributed by the account exceeds one thousand dollars, and is still in the hands of the administrator, and the distribution of the entire amount is regulated by tlio judgment. We have, therefore, jurisdiction. Constitution, Art. 81. The case does not come within the scope of any of the decisions cited by the appellees’ counsel. Motion to dismiss is, therefore, overruled.