Hanchey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., September 20, 1990 570 So. 2d 2
Hanchey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 570 So. 2d 2 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990).
Cited by
- Carter v. Exide Corp. 661 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- Sanders v. Posi-Seal Intern. 635 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Hanchey v. STATE, DOTD 597 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- Hanchey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 572 So. 2d 95 La. 1991
Opinion text
DOUCET, Judge. Plaintiff-appellant has filed a motion to have this matter reassigned for oral argument. The affidavit attached to the motion indicates that counsel for appellant was timely notified of the date, time, and place assigned on the calender for oral argument and failed to appear when the matter was called because he had intentionally delayed his arrival believing the matter would be. called later in the day. We find nothing to suggest that plaintiff-appellant has been denied an opportunity to put his case before this court. His written brief has been filed and considered. Rule 2-11.6 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal states that: “No case fixed for argument or submission on the calendar may be continued, except in extraordinary situations which the court deems to justify a continuance.” We find no extraordinary situation in this matter which would have justified a continuance of the scheduled oral argument nor which would now justify the granting of plaintiff-appellant’s motion to reschedule this matter for oral argument. MOTION DENIED.