No. 89-C-0017
Precedential
Processed
Rose v. Rose
Rose v. Rose, 559 So. 2d 1372 (La. 1990).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Rose v. Rose 535 So. 2d 1167
Opinion text
In re Rose, Franklyn D.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or re *1373 view; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 20130-CA; Parish of Lincoln, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 32805. Prior report: La.App., 535 So.2d 1167 . Not considered, not timely filed. The judgment is definitive. This Court’s delay in responding to the finding was prompted by repeated efforts to have counsel for relator provide supplementation to complete the application.