No. 89-KH-0985
Precedential
Processed
State ex rel. Eveque v. State
Also decided on this docket: La., September 29, 1989 548 So. 2d 1218
State ex rel. Eveque v. State, 543 So. 2d 2 (La. 1989).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
- State of Louisiana v. Willard Brandenburg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- State v. Brandenburg 949 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Bullard v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Development 744 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
- State v. Batiste 708 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
- Withers v. Regional Transit Authority 669 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- Theriot v. Lasseigne 624 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- State v. Searcy 621 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Gantt 616 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- Miley v. La. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 599 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Travers-Wakeford v. St. Pierre 585 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service 572 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Opinion text
In re Eveque, Elleaner V.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal. District Court, Div. “D”, No. 268-142. The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence she has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.