Gus Kaplan, Inc. v. D.H. Holmes Co.

In re D.H. Holmes Co. Ltd.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 154910; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW90-0292. Granted. Reversed. It appears that the evidence may be relevant and admissible under certain circumstances. The trial judge is ordered to rule on the evidentiary questions as the evidence is offered at trial.