DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. White, 558 So. 2d 601.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Calhoun 222 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    App. 2 Cir. 1989), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Thomas 8 So. 3d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir.1989), writ denied, State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), .
  • State v. Hernandez 735 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    App. 2 Cir.1989), writ denied, the court concluded that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in ordering defendant placed in leg restraints.
  • State v. Raymond 695 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    App. 2 Cir.1989), writ denied, the court concluded that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in ordering defendant placed in leg restraints.
  • State v. Wilson 672 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    App.2d Cir.1989), writ denied
  • State v. Fleeks 651 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    App.2d Cir.1989), writ denied, this court explained the standards for judging the propriety of restraint in the courtroom: Ordinarily a defendant before the court should not be shackled, handcuffed or garbed in any manner destructive of the presumption of his innocence or destructive of the dignity and impartiality of the judicial procee
  • State v. Plater 643 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    2d Cir.1989), writ denied
  • State v. Jackson 641 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    5th Cir.1989), writ denied
  • State v. Jackson 641 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    5th Cir.1989), writ denied
  • State v. Stone 641 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    5th Cir.1989), writ denied
  • State v. Tasby 639 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    2d Cir. 1989), writ denied
  • State v. Cleveland 630 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    2d Cir.1989), writ denied (La.App.
  • State v. Jeffers 623 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    writ denied, : Ordinarily a defendant before the court should not be shackled, handcuffed or garbed in any manner destructive of the presumption of his innocence or destructive of the dignity and impartiality of the judicial proceedings.