DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mayeaux, 575 So. 2d 386.

60 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Isaiah M. Childs La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    App. 1 Cir. 1990), writ denied, (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Darren K. Lloyd La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    App. 4th Cir. 1990), writ denied, (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tristan Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    5 Cir. 1990), writ denied, (telephone 15 name out your mouth” and his act of picking up a milk crate under the circumstances presented here, constituted threats of force.
  • State v. Becnel 250 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 5th Cir. 1990), writ denied , (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Roman Ford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    5th Cir. 1990), writ denied, ” Id.
  • State v. Ford 217 So. 3d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 5th Cir. 1990), writ denied, ” Id.
  • State v. Marrero 92 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    1 Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Napolean 87 So. 3d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 1990), writ denied, this Court held that because the defendant did not request an admonition to the jury at trial, the lack of an admonishing instruction did not constitute error.
  • State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Lara 78 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    4th Cir.1990), writ denied, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal rejected the defendant’s argument of insufficient evidence based on the sampling procedure used to test the drugs found in his possession.
  • State v. Lindsey 69 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    5th Cir.1990), writ denied, the prosecutor played for the jury a tape-recorded conversation where the defendant used the same racial epithet used here.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 1990), writ denied, the defendant moved for a mistrial when a recorded conversation between himself and the victim was played to the jury.
  • State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    App. 5 Cir.1990), writ denied, the defendant moved for a mistrial when a recorded conversation between himself and the victim was played to the jury.
  • State v. Parent 836 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5 Cir.1990), writ denied, in which defendant was convicted of intimidating a witness under facts similar to those herein.
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Langley 813 So. 2d 356 La. 2002
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied, State v. Guillory, 97-0179 (La.App.
  • State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
    1 Cir.1990), writ denied, relative to grand jury discrimination and that she was also unable to produce any information on the race of the grand jury or grand jury forepersons at that time.
  • State v. Carpenter 772 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    5 Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Toca 769 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.1990), writ denied, in which this court held that the random testing of one gram of crack cocaine was sufficient to convict the defendant of possession of at least 200 grams.
  • State v. Lucas 762 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    App. 1st Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Anthony 776 So. 2d 376 La. 2000
    5th Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Laymon 756 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    This court, writ denied, likewise held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow expert testimony on the reliability of eyewitness identifications.
  • State v. Pugh 750 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5 Cir. 1990), writ denied, (La.
  • State Ex Rel. Roper v. Cain 763 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Nogess 729 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir.1990), writ denied, citing, (La.App.
  • State v. Thibodeaux 728 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    1 Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    1 Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Francis 709 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Jackson 707 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Parker 696 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4th Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Banks 692 So. 2d 1051 La. 1997
    App. 1st Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 694 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    5 Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.App.
  • Rodriguez v. Julius 694 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    5th Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Davis 685 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    5th Cir. 1990), writ denied
  • State v. King 683 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    4 Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Dugas 683 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    5 Cir. 1990); writ denied
  • State v. Clark 670 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    5th Cir.1990), writ denied, ” The trial judge controls the flow of the case and his decision to disallow repetitive testimony should be upheld.
  • State v. Ellis 657 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    5th Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Hunter 654 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    4th Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Campbell 651 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    1 Cir.1990), writ denied, : However, since the general venire in East Baton Rouge Parish is composed of "qualified" persons drawn from a random list of registered voters and licensed drivers in that parish, the total percentage of a particular minority in the general population does not have a direct bearing on the make-up of the gene
  • State v. Bond 650 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    5 Cir.1990), writ denied at
  • State v. Mayeux 639 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    5th Cir.1990), writ denied, this Court set forth the applicable law on the elements of this offense as follows: Battery is defined as: "the intentional use of force or violence upon the person of another, or the intentional administration of a poison or other noxious liquid or substance to another."
  • State v. Green 632 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Cittadino 628 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    5th Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Arbuthnot 625 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    App. 1st Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Jones 623 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Tyler 619 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied, (1991).
  • State v. Essex 618 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Thom 615 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    1 Cir. 1990), writ denied
  • State v. Thomas 609 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    1st Cir. 1990), writ denied, (La.