DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Resignation & Disbarment by Consent of Armstrong, 584 So. 2d 1140.

64 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Eric Wayne Lemay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    3 Cir.), writ granted in part on other grounds, this court stated: “[W]e find that the trial court’s imposition of a fine upon the indigent defendant in this case, which did not provide for a jail term in the event of default of payment of the fine, is not excessive and is not an illegal sentence.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Freeman Eric Tucker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    3 Cir.), writ granted in part on other grounds, this court stated: “[W]e find that the trial court’s imposition of a fine upon the indigent defendant in this case, which did not provide for a jail term in the event of default of payment of the fine, is not excessive and is not an illegal sentence.” Additionally
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian M. Bonier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    (per curiam), the supreme court held in pertinent part: [Louisiana Revised Statutes] 15:529.1 requires that the sentencing judge vacate the original sentence and resentence the defendant as a multiple offender.
  • State of Louisiana v. Aljermon Henderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    3 Cir.), writ granted on other grounds, which also involved a case where a mandatory fine was imposed on an indigent defendant.
  • State v. Lewis 245 So. 3d 363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    State v. Dickerson , (La.
  • State v. Payne 220 So. 3d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Anderson 222 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Jamison 222 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Camp 215 So. 3d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
    App. 3 Cir. 1991), writ granted in part on other grounds, (La.
  • State v. Canales 206 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Young 203 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See: State v. Boyles, 2014-1126 (La.App.
  • State v. Gillin 202 So. 3d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Thomas 190 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Boyles 157 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Nora, 2013-0892 (La.App.
  • State v. LeBlanc 165 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    (per curiam); State v. Mendez, 13-909 (La.App.
  • State v. Brooks 150 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Austin 146 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    3d Cir.1991),« writ granted in part, (delay between conviction and sentencing over one month).
  • State v. Nora 143 So. 3d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Mendez 140 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Young 140 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Celestine 131 So. 3d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Lindsey 129 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    the trial court imposed a fine in addition to sentencing the defendant under La.
  • State v. Baskin 129 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Thomas 112 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    | T (per curiam), “the last expression of law of the Louisiana Supreme Court,” 1 I concur with the result reached by the majority.
  • State v. Thompson 135 So. 3d 663 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Jetton, 32,893 (La.App.2d Cir.4/5/00), , writ denied, 00-1568 (La.3/16/01), .
  • State v. Cross 91 So. 3d 995 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Cass 61 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Jones 51 So. 3d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Moore , 06-875 at 3, 958 So.2d at 39 n. 2, (per curiam).
  • State v. Marshall 47 So. 3d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Gipson 34 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Todd Vincent Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    (per curiam), the supreme court held in pertinent part: La.Rev.Stat.
  • State v. Dyas 32 So. 3d 364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Alfonzo Jermaine Johnlouis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    the supreme court held that the fine and default provisions of his sentence should be deleted: [Louisiana Revised Statutes] 15:529.1 requires that the sentencing judge vacate the original sentence and resentence the defendant as a multiple offender.
  • State v. Johnlouis 22 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    the supreme court held that the fine and default provisions of his sentence should be deleted: [Louisiana Revised Statutes] 15:529.1 requires that the sentencing judge vacate the original sentence and resen-tence the defendant as a multiple offender.
  • State v. Ealy 12 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.
  • State v. Thomas 13 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Moore, 06-875 at 3, 958 So.2d at 39 n. 2 ( (per curiam)).
  • State v. Dotie 1 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Jetton, 32,-893 (La.App.
  • State v. Morris 996 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Jetton, 32,893 (La.App.
  • State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    App. 3 Cir.1991), writ granted in part, (delay between conviction and sentencing over one month).
  • State v. Moore 958 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Jones 927 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    (per curiam); State v. Williams, 04-1016, p. 11 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 901 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Arthur Major III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir.), writ granted on other grounds, this court, when faced with a situation where a fine had to be imposed on a defendant it felt was indigent, found that “the trial court's imposition of a fine upon the indigent defendant in this case, which did not provide for a jail term in the event of default of payment of the fine, is not excessive a
  • State v. Major 898 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir.), writ granted on other grounds, this court, when faced with a situation where a fine had to be imposed on a defendant it felt was indigent, found that "the trial court's imposition of a fine upon the indigent defendant in this case, which did not provide for a jail term in the event of default of payment of the fine, is not excessive and
  • State v. Reichard 880 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Lebreton 859 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    3 Cir.1991), writ granted in part, (delay between conviction and sentencing exceeded one month).
  • State v. Foster 834 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    App. 3 Cir.1991), writ granted in part, (delay between conviction and sentencing over one month).
  • State v. Odle 834 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    App. 3 Cir.), writ granted in part on other grounds
  • State v. Celestine 811 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 4/17/91), modified on other grounds and affirmed