DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wheat v. State Farm Fire & Casualty, 583 So. 2d 1145.

23 citing documents.

  • David Michael Craig v. Shari Renee Bishop La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • Harrell v. Harrell 236 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 1 Cir. 1991), writ denied , (La.
  • State in the Interest of E.M.M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    1 Cir.), writ denied, ).
  • State ex rel. E.M.M. 96 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    1 Cir.), writ denied, ).
  • Explained State in the Interest of R.J.J. & M.L.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    1 Cir.), writ denied, the evidentiary standard established in termination cases mandates that the State present proof by clear and convincing evidence of the parents' failure to comply with all the enumerated conditions relied upon in the specific paragraph(s) of 2
  • Explained State in the Interest of B.K.N. & T.M.H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    1 Cir.), writ denied, the evidentiary standard established in termination cases mandates that the State present proof by clear and convincing evidence of the parents’ failure to comply with all the enumerated conditions relied upon in the specific paragraph(s) of LSA-Ch.C.
  • Explained State in Interest of Bkn 82 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    1 Cir.), writ denied, the evidentiary standard established in termination cases mandates that the State present proof by clear and convincing evidence of the parents’ failure to comply with all the enumerated conditions relied upon in the specific paragraph(s) of LSA-Ch.C.
  • Explained State Ex Rel. Ks 66 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    1 Cir.), writ denied, the evidentiary standard established in termination cases mandates that the State present proof by clear and convincing evidence of the parents' failure to comply with all the enumerated conditions relied upon in the specific paragraph(s) of LSA-Ch.C.
  • Explained State in the Interest of K.S., K.S. & D.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    1 Cir.), writ denied, the evidentiary standard established in termination cases mandates that the State present proof by clear and convincing evidence of the parents’ failure to comply with all the enumerated conditions relied upon in the specific paragraph(s) of LSA-Ch
  • Explained State ex rel. K.S. 66 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    1 Cir.), writ denied, the evidentiary standard established in termination cases mandates that the State present proof by clear and convincing evidence of the parents’ failure to comply with all the enumerated conditions relied upon in the specific paragraph(s) of LSA-Ch.C.
  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1 Cir.1991), writ denied, Hines, 567 So.2d at 1141 ; McCormick on Evidence, § 340(b) (2d ed.1972).
  • Explained Cd v. Lc 796 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    1 Cir.), writ denied, the evidentiary standard established in termination cases mandates that the State present proof by clear and convincing evidence of the parents' failure to comply with all the enumerated conditions relied upon in the specific paragraph(s) of LSA-Ch.C.
  • Explained In the Interest of C.D. v. L.C. 796 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    1 Cir.), writ denied, the evidentiary standard established in termination cases mandates that the State present proof by clear and convincing evidence of the parents’ failure to comply with all the enumerated conditions relied upon in the specific paragraph(s) of LSA-Ch.C.
  • Bell v. Ayio 731 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    1st Cir.), writs denied, ($60,000 general damages to woman who sustained an "extremely painful" rotational fracture to the tibia resulting in 10 percent loss of motion in her ankle and 5 percent permanent disability to the lower leg); Arthur v. State, DHHR, (La.App.
  • Jones v. Hawkins 708 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    1st Cir.), writs denied (1991).
  • State, in Interest of Jk 702 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Delaune v. Medical Ctr. of Baton Rouge 683 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Explained In the Interest of S.R.S. 688 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    1 Cir.), writ denied, the evidentiary standard established in termination cases *1147 mandates that the State present proof by clear and convincing evidence of the parents’ failure to comply with all the enumerated conditions relied upon in the specific paragraph(s) of LSA-Ch.C.
  • State in Interest of BJ 672 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    1st Cir.) (Lanier, J., concurring), writ denied
  • Explained State in Interest of QP 649 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    1 Cir.), writ denied, the evidentiary standard established in termination cases mandates that the State present proof by clear and convincing evidence of the parents' failure to comply with all the enumerated conditions relied upon in the specific paragraph(s) of LSA-Ch.C.
  • State ex rel. R.E. 642 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • DiVincenti v. McIntyre 611 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State ex rel. CH 599 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    1st Cir.), (Lanier, J. concurring), writ denied