Cousins v. City of New Orleans
Cousins v. City of New Orleans, 584 So. 2d 1145 (La. 1991).
Cited by
- Louisiana Mun. Ass'n v. State 773 So. 2d 663 La. 2000
- Miller v. City of New Orleans 665 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- Garner v. Sheats & Frazier 663 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
- Town of Berwick v. Justilian 634 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- State v. Balthazar 617 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- Cousins v. City of New Orleans 608 So. 2d 978 La. 1992
- State v. Perry 610 So. 2d 746 La. 1992
- Spinks v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERV. 605 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- Vallery v. State 605 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- State v. Tucker 604 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- Cousins v. City of New Orleans 594 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Cousins v. City of New Orleans 580 So. 2d 536
Opinion text
In re New Orleans City of; Barthelemy, Sidney Mayor; New Orleans City Coun *1146 cil; — Defendants); applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 90CA-1110; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “K”, No. 85-9819. Prior report: La.App., 580 So.2d 536 . Writ granted and case remanded to the court of appeal to decide the issue of whether the plaintiff is receiving disability plan benefits which serve to reduce worker’s compensation benefits under LSA-R.S. 23:1225(C)(1) or retirement benefits which do not reduce compensation benefits. If it is determined that plaintiff is receiving disability plan benefits, then the case should be remanded to the district court for additional evidence and a decision on the proportion of the pension and relief plan funded by the City, and a determination of the worker’s compensation benefits, if any, payable to plaintiff. CALOGERO, C.J., dissents.