No. 91-CA-231 Precedential Dismissed Processed

Perez v. Verret

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed October 16, 1991 · 588 So. 2d 398

Cited by

State v. Mills 120 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Luke Matthew Bivens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Bivens 74 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Eric L. Hunter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Hunter 41 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Lewis 965 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Sylvia 845 So. 2d 358 La. 2003
State v. Sylvester 834 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Daggs 823 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Lipscomb 807 So. 2d 218 La. 2002
State v. Jones 792 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Handy 779 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001

Opinion text

PER CURIAM. This appeal relates to the overruling of a declinatory exception of insufficient service of process. We dismiss the matter. La.C.C.P. art. 2083 governs appealable judgments. Art. 2083 provides: A. An appeal may be taken from a final judgment rendered in causes in which appeals are given by law whether rendered after hearing or by default, from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury, and from a judgment reformed in accordance with a remittitur or additur under Article 1814. B. In reviewing a judgment reformed in accordance with a remittitur or addi-tur, the court shall consider the reasonableness of the underlying jury verdict. A judgment overruling an exception is interlocutory in nature and, therefore, is not appealable absent a showing of irreparable injury, and we find none. For the reasons assigned, the matter is dismissed. All costs of this appeal are to be assessed against the appellant. DISMISSED.