No. 91-CA-286
Precedential
Processed
Cosse v. Allen-Bradley Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 29, 1992 612 So. 2d 286
Cosse v. Allen-Bradley Co., 590 So. 2d 108 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991).
Cited by
- Cosse v. Allen-Bradley Co. 625 So. 2d 486 La. 1994
- Cosse v. Allen-Bradley Co. 612 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Cosse v. Allen-Bradley Co. 601 So. 2d 1349 La. 1992
- Cosse v. Allen-Bradley Co. 592 So. 2d 402 La. 1992
- Cosse v. Allen-Bradley Co. 592 So. 2d 402 La. 1992
Opinion text
DUFRESNE, J., concurring with written reasons. I concur with the majority in reversing the trial court, however, the peremption of R.S. 9:2772 should have been applied to both Link Belt/FMC Corporation and Rust Engineering Company. The conveyor was an improvement to immovable property performed in 1948, thus the claim against Link Belt/FMC Corporation and Rust has been perempted thru the operation of La. R.S. 9:2772.