Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Philippe v. Gibson, 590 So. 2d 574.

26 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Antoinette Frank La. 2025
(1991)(finding it civil for the purposes of the public records act) ; Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.
Muhammad v. Office of the Dist. Attorney for the Parish of St. James 275 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2/21/01), , 695, citing Lemmon v. Connick , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Troy Edward Delozier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
2/21/01), (alteration in original), the supreme court noted: Furthermore, this court held that post-conviction relief is not “criminal litigation” within the meaning of the Public Records Act and ordered the district attorney to “produce records in its possession and not otherwise privileged.” Neither party to the instant litigation challenges the holding
State v. Delozier 269 So. 3d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2/21/01), , 695 (alteration in original), the supreme court noted: Furthermore, in Lemmon v. Connick , this court held that post-conviction relief is not "criminal litigation" within the meaning of the Public Records Act and ordered the district attorney to "produce records in its possession and not otherwise privileged."
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Marshall 177 So. 3d 324 La. 2015
The state contends respondent could have obtained the district attorney‟s file once his conviction and sentence became final in 2001, (La.
State v. Leger 168 So. 3d 382 La. 2015
4 Cir. 9/3/97) , ("The Public Records Act was interpreted to allow defendants full access to district attorney’s ”).
Innocence Project New Orleans v. New Orleans Police Department 129 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In its written request, but without any obligation on its part, the Innocence Project informed the *673 custodian that Mr. Brown’s conviction had “been affirmed on direct appeal and is final; [sic] making the records open to public inspection.” The Innocence Project also, in its request, (per curiam), (La.App.
Landis v. Moreau 779 So. 2d 691 La. 2001
Furthermore, this court held that post-conviction relief is not "criminal litigation" within the meaning of the Public Records Act and ordered the district attorney to "produce records in its possession and not otherwise privileged."
State v. Edwards 746 So. 2d 1267 La. 1999
In 1997, Edwards obtained a copy of his district attorney file, and in 1998, he filed an application for post-conviction relief in which he claimed that the state suppressed exculpatory evidence in violation of his due process rights as set out in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct.
State v. Chapman 699 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
The Public Records Act was interpreted to allow defendants full access to district attorney’s
State v. Code 695 So. 2d 976 La. 1997
State v. Dilosa 662 So. 2d 1040 La. 1995
Fussell v. Reed 664 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
An exception for records pertaining to pending criminal litigation is found in Revised Statute 44:3, that post-conviction relief is not "criminal litigation" within the meaning of that exception.
State Ex Rel. Glover v. State 660 So. 2d 1189 La. 1995
Wallace v. Ware 657 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Marler v. 22nd Judicial District Court 645 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Winn v. City of Alexandria 643 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Wright 641 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
*632 Similarly, because post-conviction relief is analogous to a civil action ( ), its retroactive application is permissible because the legislature provided a reasonable time in which such claims might be brought before they were foreclosed.
Mitchell v. Greenburg 640 So. 2d 1367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
for the proposition that post-conviction relief is not “criminal litigation” within the meaning of the exemptions section of the public records act.
Trenticosta v. Mamoulides 633 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
ANALYSIS — ISSUE TWO The plaintiff asserts that, (La.App.
Carter v. Connick 623 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Article 12, Section 3 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 grants Louisiana citizens an unequivocal right to examine public records.
Voelker v. Miller 613 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State ex rel. Broussard v. Boudreaux 608 So. 2d 180 La. 1992
State ex rel. Counterman v. Whitley 611 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
In Lemmon v. Connick, 1 the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that a criminal defendant cannot be denied access to his criminal files after his conviction becomes final and that post conviction relief is not criminal litigation within the meaning of the Louisiana Public Records Act.
State Ex Rel. Tassin v. Whitley 602 So. 2d 721 La. 1992
Nodier v. Woodfork 600 So. 2d 672 La. 1992