No. 91-KH-0927 Precedential Processed

State ex rel. Sprinkle v. State

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed May 2, 1991 · 578 So. 2d 918

Also decided on this docket: La., June 28, 1991 582 So. 2d 1298

Cited by

State v. Ballay 727 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State ex rel. Sprinkle v. State 582 So. 2d 1298 La. 1991

Opinion text

In re Sprinkle, Jimmy; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 244-896. The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion *919 for production of evidentiary hearing transcript he has filed on or about March 4, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.