Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. Williams v. State, 588 So. 2d 113.

29 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Peter A. Barrosse La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    App. 1 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Eugene Vascocu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
  • Distinguished Bradley B. Womack and Elizabeth Cavalier Womack, Individually and on behalf of Mark Womack and Erroll E. Strahan … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
    App. 3rd Cir.), writ denied, ( La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jesse E. Ducote A/K/A Jesse Ducote La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Jarrett Andrews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3rd Cir.) writ denied, where it was determined that the defendant acted below the standard of care expected to be maintained by reasonably careful persons under similar circumstances when he brought a loaded gun into a bar, pulled the gun out of his pants pocket, and the gun discharged killing an innocent
  • State v. Andrews 265 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    3rd Cir.) writ denied , where it was determined that the defendant acted below the standard of care expected to be maintained by reasonably careful persons under similar circumstances when he brought a loaded gun into a bar, pulled the gun out of his pants pocket, and the gun discharged killing an innocent victim.
  • State v. Nixon 250 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 1st Cir.), writ denied , (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Rosalyn Faith Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3 Cir.), writ denied, wherein this court affirmed the trial court’s finding of criminal negligence.
  • State v. Zeno 155 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1st Cir.1991) (), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Adams 119 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    1 Cir. 5/16/91), writ denied, citing La.
  • U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Lewis 108 So. 3d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Mary Henderson Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3rd Cir.) writ denied, where it was determined that the defendant acted below the standard of care expected to be maintained by reasonably careful persons under similar circumstances when he brought a loaded gun into a bar, pulled the gun out of his pants pocket, an
  • State v. Trahan 69 So. 3d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3rd Cir.) writ denied, where it was determined that the defendant acted below the standard of care expected to be maintained by reasonably careful persons under similar circumstances when he brought a loaded gun into a bar, pulled the gun out of his pants pocket, and the gun discharged killing an innocent victim.
  • State v. Desoto 6 So. 3d 141 La. 2009
    3rd Cir.) writ denied, where it was determined that the defendant acted below the standard of care expected to be maintained by reasonably careful persons under similar circumstances when he brought a loaded gun into a bar, pulled the gun out of his pants pocket, and the gun discharged killing an innocent victim.
  • State v. Lloyd 973 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    3d Cir.1991), writ denied, the defendant brought a gun to a nightclub and while moving the gun from his pants pocket to the front of his pants, someone bumped the defendant and the gun went off, killing the victim.
  • State v. Desoto 968 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir.), writ denied, wherein the defendant brought a gun to a nightclub and while moving the gun from the back to the front of his pants, someone bumped the defendant and the gun went off, killing the victim.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jake C. Desoto La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir.), writ denied, wherein the defendant brought a gun to a nightclub and while moving the gun from the back to the front of his pants, someone bumped the defendant and the gun went off, killing the victim.
  • State v. Anderson 784 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. McBride 773 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    1st Cir.), writ denied, the court found that "even if the Louisiana Code of Evidence prohibits the introduction of certain testimony, in those rare cases where the evidentiary rule impermissibly impairs the defendant's right to present a defense, the evidence still should be admitted."
  • State v. Corley 703 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    1st Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied
  • State v. Crawford 672 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Clark 670 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    1 Cir.), writ denied, (1991).
  • State v. Galliano 639 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Chapman 625 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    3 Cir. 1991), writ denied
  • State v. Folse 623 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Gunnells 619 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Hill 610 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    1st Cir.1991), writ denied, the court found that "even if the Louisiana Code of Evidence prohibits the introduction of certain testimony, in those rare cases where the evidentiary rule impermissibly impairs the defendant's right to present a defense, the evidence still should be admitted".
  • State v. Martin 590 So. 2d 62 La. 1991
    In re Martin, Merlin J.; — Defendants); applying for reconsideration of this Court’s action dated November 1, 1991, ; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 164106; Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA90 0969.