Guillory v. Bailey
Guillory v. Bailey, 621 So. 2d 1191 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Miller v. Bailey 621 So. 2d 1174
Opinion text
WILLIAM A. CULPEPPER, Judge Pro Tem. This is a companion suit to Miller v. Bailey, et al., 621 So.2d 1174 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), No. 92-1178 on the docket of this court. For the reasons assigned in Miller , the judgment of the trial court is reversed in part to assess -0- fault to the State, Department of Transportation and Development, the State, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, and Anthony Shane Richard; plaintiff Guillory’s claims against them are dismissed. The' judgment is amended to assess fault as follows: Stephen S. Bailey — 50%; Antonial K. Miller— 20%; plaintiff Charles Guillory — 17%; third persons (non parties) — 13%. The quantum of the trial court’s award of $10,000 damages is affirmed. Accordingly, the judgment is amended to award $1649.17 to Charles Guillory and against Antonial K. Miller only. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. *1192 Costs in the trial court and of this appeal are assessed equally against the defendant, Antonial K. Miller, and Charles Guillory. REVERSED in PART; AFFIRMED in PART; AMENDED and RENDERED.