Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Willett v. National Fire & Marine Insurance Co., 598 So. 2d 355.
-
State of Louisiana v. Donald Alan Crooks
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: When a sentencing judge orders a defendant to make restitution to the victim, both La.C.Cr.P.
-
State of Louisiana v. Vernon Holden A/K/A Vernon Demtrius Holden, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
-
State of Louisiana v. Phillip Jarratt
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
App. 3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, (1992), the defendant was sentenced to five years at hard labor, three years suspended, and three years’ supervised probation with restitution as a condition of probation.
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael Jerome Cochran A/K/A Michael Jerome Cochran, Jr. A/K/A Michael Cochran
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
-
State of Louisiana v. Trivual A. Charles -Aka- Trivual Batiste -Aka- Trivual Charles
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
-
State of Louisiana v. Elvin Bryant Jinks, Jr. -Aka- Elvin Jinks
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
-
State v. Charles
270 So. 3d 859
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3 Cir.1991), writ denied , this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
-
State v. Jinks
267 So. 3d 688
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
-
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Bell, Sr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: Generally, this error, while patent, is not reversible unless the defendant is prejudiced by the lack of a sentencing delay.
-
State v. Bell
140 So. 3d 830
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
App. 3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: Generally, this error, while patent, is not reversible unless the defendant is prejudiced by the lack of a sentencing delay.
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Hood
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, found that the failure to abide by the delay requires a sentence to be vacated simply because the defendant challenged his sentence on appeal.
-
State v. PORTIE
22 So. 3d 213
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Brian A. Verret
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: When a sentencing judge orders a defendant to make restitution to the victim, both La.C.Cr.P.
-
State v. Verret
9 So. 3d 1112
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: When a sentencing judge orders a defendant to make restitution to the victim, both La.C.Cr.P.
-
State of Louisiana v. Richard W. Black
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, found that the failure to abide by the delay requires a sentence to be vacated simply because the defendant challenged his sentence on appeal.
-
State v. CSD
4 So. 3d 204
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, *210 found that the failure to abide by the delay requires a sentence to be vacated simply because the defendant challenged his sentence on appeal.
-
State of Louisiana v. C.S.D. & E.L.C.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, found that the failure to abide by the delay requires a sentence to be vacated simply because the defendant 3 Information from the district court clerk’s office indicates written motions were filed, but misplaced, except for
-
State v. AUGUILLARD
997 So. 2d 904
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, "
-
State of Louisiana v. Russell J. Auguillard, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, ” We find that although the trial court failed to observe the delay provided for in Article 873, the defendant failed to object to the trial court’s failure, and was fully prepared to participate at the sentencing hearing of that day.
-
State v. Kennedy
963 So. 2d 1101
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
3d Cir.1991), writ denied
-
State of Louisiana v. J. M.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, cf. State v. Randle, 02-309, 02-310 (La.App.
-
State v. JM
941 So. 2d 686
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, (La.
-
State v. J.M.
941 So. 2d 686
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, cf .
-
State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, cf. State v. Randle, 02-309, 02-310 (La.App.
-
State v. Fussell
941 So. 2d 109
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Steven R. Thomas
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 1991), writ denied
-
State v. Thomas
924 So. 2d 1146
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
App. 3 Cir.1991), writ denied
-
State of Louisiana v. John Joseph
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 1991), 2 writ denied, cf. State v. Randle, 02-309, 02-310 (La.App.
-
State v. Joseph
916 So. 2d 378
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, cf. State v. Randle, 02-309, 02-310 (La.App.
-
Roy Weldon v. Monica Curry
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir.), writ denied, we found the enactment of La.R.S.
-
Weldon v. Curry
899 So. 2d 101
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
3 Cir.), writ denied, we found the enactment of La.
-
Champagne v. Ward
893 So. 2d 773
La. 2005
3rd Cir.02/12/92), writ denied, the court held that "(w)e interpret the effect of Act 444 of *780 1987 as overruling Snider .
-
State v. Devare
860 So. 2d 191
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, (La.App.
-
State v. Alexander
854 So. 2d 456
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: When a sentencing judge orders a defendant to make restitution to the victim, both La.C.Cr.P.
-
State of Louisiana v. James T.K." Alexander "
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, this court stated: When a sentencing judge orders a defendant to make restitution to the victim, both La.C.Cr.P.
-
State v. Shepherd
839 So. 2d 1103
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, and State v. Bishop, 98-1147 (La.App.
-
State v. Randle
827 So. 2d 657
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, (La.
-
Zuviceh v. Nationwide Ins. Co.
786 So. 2d 340
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
3d Cir.), writ denied, Holcomb v. Universal Insurance Co., 93-1424 (La.
-
Adams v. Thomason
753 So. 2d 416
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
3d Cir.1992), writ denied, the court held that the 1987 amendment to the UM statute legislatively overruled the Snider decision.
-
State v. Bishop
734 So. 2d 674
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3 Cir.1991), writ denied
-
State v. Dronet
721 So. 2d 1038
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: Generally, this error, while patent, is not reversible unless the defendant is prejudiced by the lack of a sentencing delay.
- Abshire v. Reliance National Indemnity Co. 711 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Anderson v. Oliver 705 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
- Isaac v. Patterson Ins. Co. 702 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
-
State v. Boswell
689 So. 2d 627
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated the following concerning an identical error patent: Generally, this error, while patent, is not reversible unless the defendant is prejudiced by the lack of a sentencing delay.
-
Trautman v. Poor
685 So. 2d 516
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
3 Cir.), writ denied, "the object of the Louisiana Uninsured Motorist Statute, La.R.S.
-
State v. Williams
677 So. 2d 692
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. Joseph 649 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-
Holcomb v. Universal Ins. Co.
640 So. 2d 718
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
3rd Cir.1992), writ denied, and, concluded: After evaluating the strength and pertinence of the relevant policies of Louisiana and Arkansas as directed by La.C.C.