Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Willett v. National Fire & Marine Insurance Co., 598 So. 2d 355.

49 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Alan Crooks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: When a sentencing judge orders a defendant to make restitution to the victim, both La.C.Cr.P.
  • State of Louisiana v. Vernon Holden A/K/A Vernon Demtrius Holden, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
  • State of Louisiana v. Phillip Jarratt La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
    App. 3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, (1992), the defendant was sentenced to five years at hard labor, three years suspended, and three years’ supervised probation with restitution as a condition of probation.
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Jerome Cochran A/K/A Michael Jerome Cochran, Jr. A/K/A Michael Cochran La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
  • State of Louisiana v. Trivual A. Charles -Aka- Trivual Batiste -Aka- Trivual Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
  • State of Louisiana v. Elvin Bryant Jinks, Jr. -Aka- Elvin Jinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Charles 270 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied , this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Jinks 267 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Bell, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: Generally, this error, while patent, is not reversible unless the defendant is prejudiced by the lack of a sentencing delay.
  • State v. Bell 140 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    App. 3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: Generally, this error, while patent, is not reversible unless the defendant is prejudiced by the lack of a sentencing delay.
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, found that the failure to abide by the delay requires a sentence to be vacated simply because the defendant challenged his sentence on appeal.
  • State v. PORTIE 22 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian A. Verret La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: When a sentencing judge orders a defendant to make restitution to the victim, both La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Verret 9 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: When a sentencing judge orders a defendant to make restitution to the victim, both La.C.Cr.P.
  • State of Louisiana v. Richard W. Black La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, found that the failure to abide by the delay requires a sentence to be vacated simply because the defendant challenged his sentence on appeal.
  • State v. CSD 4 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, *210 found that the failure to abide by the delay requires a sentence to be vacated simply because the defendant challenged his sentence on appeal.
  • State of Louisiana v. C.S.D. & E.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, found that the failure to abide by the delay requires a sentence to be vacated simply because the defendant 3 Information from the district court clerk’s office indicates written motions were filed, but misplaced, except for
  • State v. AUGUILLARD 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, "
  • State of Louisiana v. Russell J. Auguillard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, ” We find that although the trial court failed to observe the delay provided for in Article 873, the defendant failed to object to the trial court’s failure, and was fully prepared to participate at the sentencing hearing of that day.
  • State v. Kennedy 963 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    3d Cir.1991), writ denied
  • State of Louisiana v. J. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, cf. State v. Randle, 02-309, 02-310 (La.App.
  • State v. JM 941 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. J.M. 941 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, cf .
  • State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, cf. State v. Randle, 02-309, 02-310 (La.App.
  • State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Steven R. Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 1991), writ denied
  • State v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    App. 3 Cir.1991), writ denied
  • State of Louisiana v. John Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 1991), 2 writ denied, cf. State v. Randle, 02-309, 02-310 (La.App.
  • State v. Joseph 916 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, cf. State v. Randle, 02-309, 02-310 (La.App.
  • Roy Weldon v. Monica Curry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir.), writ denied, we found the enactment of La.R.S.
  • Weldon v. Curry 899 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    3 Cir.), writ denied, we found the enactment of La.
  • Champagne v. Ward 893 So. 2d 773 La. 2005
    3rd Cir.02/12/92), writ denied, the court held that "(w)e interpret the effect of Act 444 of *780 1987 as overruling Snider .
  • State v. Devare 860 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Alexander 854 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: When a sentencing judge orders a defendant to make restitution to the victim, both La.C.Cr.P.
  • State of Louisiana v. James T.K." Alexander " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, this court stated: When a sentencing judge orders a defendant to make restitution to the victim, both La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Shepherd 839 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, and State v. Bishop, 98-1147 (La.App.
  • State v. Randle 827 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, (La.
  • Zuviceh v. Nationwide Ins. Co. 786 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    3d Cir.), writ denied, Holcomb v. Universal Insurance Co., 93-1424 (La.
  • Adams v. Thomason 753 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    3d Cir.1992), writ denied, the court held that the 1987 amendment to the UM statute legislatively overruled the Snider decision.
  • State v. Bishop 734 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied
  • State v. Dronet 721 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: Generally, this error, while patent, is not reversible unless the defendant is prejudiced by the lack of a sentencing delay.
  • Abshire v. Reliance National Indemnity Co. 711 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Anderson v. Oliver 705 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • Isaac v. Patterson Ins. Co. 702 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Boswell 689 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated the following concerning an identical error patent: Generally, this error, while patent, is not reversible unless the defendant is prejudiced by the lack of a sentencing delay.
  • Trautman v. Poor 685 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.), writ denied, "the object of the Louisiana Uninsured Motorist Statute, La.R.S.
  • State v. Williams 677 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.1991), writ denied, this court stated: La.C.Cr.P.
  • Travelers Insurance Co. v. Joseph 649 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Holcomb v. Universal Ins. Co. 640 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    3rd Cir.1992), writ denied, and, concluded: After evaluating the strength and pertinence of the relevant policies of Louisiana and Arkansas as directed by La.C.C.