Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Warren v. Bergeron, 604 So. 2d 995.

16 citing documents.

  • Michael A. Couvillion in His Capacity as Sheriff of Vermilion Parish v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
  • State v. Molette 258 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Hicks 258 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Blueford 137 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir.1991), writ denied
  • State v. McCullough 774 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Meyers 748 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4th Cir. 1991), writ denied
  • State v. Thomas 747 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 1991), writ denied (motion in limine, heard outside the jury’s presence, to show existence of plea agreement).
  • State v. White 695 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    4th Cir.1991), writ denied, concluded that article 609.1 allows the admission of a prior arrest in special circumstances: When the purpose is to show that the witness has bias or prejudice against a defendant or party to the litigation, the witness may be examined on the issue to establish the bias, prejudice, corruption or interest.
  • State v. Matthews 679 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    4th Cir.1991), writ denied, "[t]his includes evidence of the existence of any agreement or deal with the State whereby the witness receives any benefit or gain in exchange for the testimony given."
  • Segura v. State Farm Ins. Co. 657 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Hi-Tech Timber v. Valley Elec. Member. 649 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    3d Cir.), writ denied, (1992); Doyle, supra ; Callender, supra .
  • State v. Grace 643 So. 2d 1306 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    4 Cir.1991), reh'g denied, interpreted LSA-C.E.
  • Smith v. LOUISIANA HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 637 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    3rd Cir.) (Supreme Court ruling reversing decision of Court of Appeal to change venue was not subject to further review by Court of Appeal under principle of the law of the case.), writ denied
  • State v. Griffin 618 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    4th Cir.1991), writ denied, : When the purpose is to show that the witness has bias or prejudice against a defendant or party to the litigation, the witness may be examined on the issue to establish bias, prejudice, corruption or interest.
  • State v. Williams 618 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    App. 4th Cir.1991), writ denied (La.App.
  • State v. Mays 612 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    4th Cir.1991), writ denied