Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gagnon v. Gagnon, 608 So. 2d 174.

14 citing documents.

Courtney Jo Tully v. Alfredo Granillo, Hudgins Roofing Company, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 1992), writ denied, (La.
Saulsbury Industries, Inc. v. Cabot Corporation and Cleco Power, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
App. Ist Cir. 1992), writ denied, (La.
Etcher v. Neumann 806 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
App. 1st Cir.), writ denied
State v. Obney 746 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
App. 1 Cir.1992), writ denied
T.D. v. M.M.M. 730 So. 2d 873 La. 1999
Td v. Mmm 730 So. 2d 873 La. 1999
Demery v. Housing Auth. of New Orleans 689 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
1st Cir.1992), writ denied
Williamson v. Haynes Best Western 688 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
4 Cir.1992), writs denied (La.
Desselle v. St. Paul Insurance Co. 688 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Jefferson Parish School Bd. v. First Commerce Corp. 669 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
art. 966(B); Transworld Drilling Co. v. Texas General Resources, Inc., writ denied
Wolfe v. Canal Marine Repair, Inc. 660 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
4th Cir.1992), writ denied as follows: |3AppeIlate courts apply a de novo standard of review when considering trial court judgments on motions for summary judgment, using the same criteria applied by trial courts to determine whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Explained Futch v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 654 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, : Appellate courts apply a de novo standard of review when considering trial court judgments on motions for summary judgment, using the same criteria applied by trial court to determine whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Baldwin v. Kikas 635 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Shuff v. Southern Silica of Louisiana 626 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993