State v. Frazier
State v. Frazier, 618 So. 2d 1217 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana v. Akeeley Keshawn Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
- State v. Ford 275 So. 3d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana Versus Derrick A. Ford, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
- State v. Wilson 79 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
- State v. Floyd 946 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Crosby 338 So. 2d 584
Opinion text
GAUDIN, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the setting aside of Willie Frazier’s plea of guilty. While it is a matter of record that there was some discussion of a plea of guilty under the provisions of State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La.1976), I believe this discussion was inadvertent and meaningless because (1) Frazier was represented by an able attorney, (2) all the terms of the plea were fully and clearly explained by the trial judge, (3) the terms of the plea-bargaining process were very favorable from the defendant’s viewpoint and (4) the plea entered by Frazier acted as a waiver of any defects not specially and specifically brought to the *1220 court’s attention. Frazier was not denied due process. He benefitted directly from the plea-bargaining procedure.